Ramp vs Procurify for Biotech Consultants Handling Regulated Materials
A biotech or life sciences consultancy should set up Ramp or Procurify with two spend categories in mind: ordinary software and travel, and lab materials or equipment that may carry import, export or hazardous materials paperwork regardless of dollar amount. Treating them alike is the most common setup mistake.
Vendors Covered in this Article
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
How should you flag regulated materials purchases before ordering?
Certain reagents, biological materials, and lab equipment carry import or export documentation requirements, and in some cases require an end-use or end-user certification before a vendor will even ship. This isn't a dollar-amount question, a small order of a controlled material needs the same documentation as a large one. Procurify's requisition model fits this naturally: the purchase request is the place to attach the compliance paperwork before the order goes out, rather than discovering after the fact that a shipment is held up because the paperwork was never prepared. A card-only approach has no natural place to attach this kind of documentation, which is the strongest argument for a requisition step in this industry specifically, regardless of firm size.
Separate regulatory subcontractors from general consulting overhead
Regulatory affairs consultants and specialized statistical or clinical software brought in for a specific engagement should tie to that engagement's economics, the same billable-tagging discipline other project-based consultancies need. Business and consumer services firms, the closest general benchmark here, typically collect on invoices in around 67.3 days1, so an untagged regulatory subcontractor cost can sit unrecovered for well over two months if nobody links it to the client engagement at the point of purchase.
Watch vendor payment terms against specialized supplier relationships
Firms in this category typically pay vendors in around 24.4 days2, and specialized lab suppliers, often smaller, more specialized vendors than a typical software company, can be less forgiving of late payment than a large enterprise vendor would be. Maintaining reliable payment terms with a specialized supplier matters more here than in industries with more interchangeable vendor options, since finding an alternative source for a specific reagent or piece of equipment isn't always fast or simple, and a firm that has built a reliable payment history with a niche supplier is in a far better position to ask that supplier for a rushed order when a project timeline suddenly tightens without warning.
Who should be authorized to order regulated materials?
Not everyone on staff should be able to order a controlled or regulated material, even at a small consultancy, and that authorization should be documented independently of whatever spend tool handles the transaction itself. Whichever platform you use, maintain a short, current list of who's authorized to initiate these specific purchases, and require that authorization as a condition of the purchase request, not something checked informally after the order is already placed. Update the list whenever staff change, and note the update itself somewhere, since an outdated authorization list is nearly as risky as having no list at all.
Build a retention file for every regulated purchase, not just the shipment record
A vendor's shipping confirmation or invoice usually isn't sufficient documentation on its own if a regulator or a client's own auditor later asks how a specific material was sourced and handled. Keep the full chain together, the original purchase request, the compliance paperwork attached to it, the vendor's certification, and any internal sign-off, filed against the purchase rather than scattered across email and a separate compliance folder that nobody remembers to cross-reference. Procurify's requisition record is a natural anchor for this, since everything else can be attached to it in one place rather than reconstructed from multiple systems when someone asks for the full picture months or years later. Firms that only keep the shipment record, without the reasoning and authorization behind it, often find that's not enough when a client's own quality or regulatory team asks for the complete story, not just proof that something arrived.
Build the retention file for each regulated purchase in this order:
- Save the original purchase request that names the material, the vendor and the person requesting it.
- Attach the compliance paperwork, such as import, export or end-use documentation, to that same request.
- File the vendor's certification alongside it, since a shipping confirmation or invoice alone is rarely enough documentation.
- Add any internal sign-off, including confirmation that the requester was on the authorized list for regulated materials.
- Keep the whole chain together against the purchase record so it can be produced if a regulator or client auditor asks.
Pick based on how much of your spend touches regulated materials
A consultancy that's mostly desk-based advisory work, with little physical material purchasing, can lean on Ramp's card controls for most of its spend. A consultancy regularly ordering reagents, specialized equipment, or anything with import or export documentation attached gets real value from Procurify's requisition step as the default for that category, even if Ramp handles everything else. See Procurify vs Coupa vs Ramp for a look at a third vendor.
What Good Looks Like
Every regulated material purchase carries its required documentation before the order is placed, regulatory subcontractor costs are tagged to the client engagement that needs them, and a current, limited list controls who can initiate a regulated purchase at all.
Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)
How to Get Started
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
Use Ramp's card controls for routine software, travel, and consulting overhead, keeping regulated material purchases on a separate, documented path.
Use Process Street to standardize the compliance checklist every regulated material purchase has to complete before an order goes out.
Use Zapier to notify an operations lead when a purchase request is flagged for a regulated material category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does every lab material purchase need special documentation?
No, but enough of them do that it's worth checking before ordering rather than assuming a purchase is routine. Certain reagents and biological materials carry import, export, or end-use documentation requirements regardless of the dollar amount involved.
Should regulatory subcontractor costs be billed to the client engagement?
Usually yes, since they're typically incurred for a specific engagement's regulatory strategy. Tag the cost to the engagement at the point of purchase so it reaches the client invoice on schedule instead of being reconstructed later.
Who should be authorized to order regulated materials?
A short, deliberately limited list, reviewed periodically, not simply anyone with a company card. Document the list independently of whichever spend tool you use, and require that authorization as part of the purchase approval itself.
Is Procurify necessary if we only occasionally order lab materials?
It's worth using at least for that category specifically, even if Ramp handles everything else. The documentation a requisition creates matters more for occasional, higher-scrutiny purchases than for routine, everyday spend.
Sources
Where we quote a benchmark, we show its source. Other figures in this guide are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.
- Receivables days (DSO proxy, AR/Sales x 365) by industry (US). NYU Stern (Aswath Damodaran), Working Capital Ratios by Industry, US, 2026.
- Payables days (AP/Sales x 365) by industry (US). NYU Stern (Aswath Damodaran), Working Capital Ratios by Industry, US, 2026.
Related Guides
Procurify vs Coupa vs Ramp: Procurement & Purchasing Software Compared
Compare Procurify, Coupa, and Ramp for purchase order approvals, 3-way matching, corporate cards, vendor contract tracking, and spend compliance controls.
Justworks vs Rippling for a Biotech Consulting Firm's Two Hires
A worked example of a life sciences consulting firm hiring a remote computational biologist and a lab-based technician, and what each PEO handles well.
Rippling vs Firstbase for Biotech Consultants Working Across Client Labs
For life sciences and biotech consulting firms: comparing Rippling and Firstbase for a team split between licensed software needs and client-site data rules.
Make vs Zapier for Life Sciences Consultants Handling Data
See how Make and Zapier compare for a life sciences or biotech consulting firm managing proposals, regulatory submission tracking and sensitive project data.
Kandji vs Rippling IT for Life Sciences Consultants
Life sciences and biotech consultants handle unpublished client research on their laptops. How Kandji and Rippling compare for protecting that data.
Why Biotech Consultants Need Data Integrity in the Workflow Itself
A study record reconstructed after the fact is a weaker record. Here's how life sciences and biotech consultancies build data integrity into daily workflow.