Choosing Ramp or Procurify When You Bill by Design Phase
For an architecture firm billing by design phase, the choice between Ramp and Procurify depends on where the right control point sits as each project moves between phases. BIM and rendering costs cluster early, material and specification costs build midway, and subconsultant coordination runs throughout.
Vendors Covered in this Article
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
How should you license BIM seats across project phases?
BIM and visualization software is usually licensed per seat, and a firm ramping a project team up for a major schematic push often needs more seats temporarily than it needs once the project moves into construction administration. Procurify's requisition model handles this well: a temporary seat request tied to a specific project phase creates a natural end date, rather than adding a seat that quietly becomes permanent because nobody thought to remove it once the phase ended. Ramp's card model works fine for the ongoing baseline of seats the firm always needs, but temporary, phase-driven additions are exactly the kind of purchase that benefits from a documented reason and an expected end date attached from the start.
Separate client-reimbursable costs from firm overhead early
Rendering services, physical models, and printing for client presentations are often reimbursable, while the firm's own software and internal tools are not. This is the same billable-versus-absorbed distinction other project-based services firms face, and it matters here because architecture and engineering firms collect slowly: receivables run around 100.4 days on average1, well over three months. Any reimbursable cost that isn't tagged to its project and phase the moment it's incurred is cash the firm is fronting for a long stretch, and it's easy to lose track of a rendering invoice or a material sample order in the flurry of a deadline push. Build the habit of tagging a reimbursable cost the same day it's incurred, while the presentation or milestone it supported is still fresh enough that nobody has to guess which client meeting it was actually for.
Watch payment terms against that same long collection cycle
Firms in this category typically pay their own vendors in about 36 days2, far faster than the 100.4 days it usually takes to collect on an invoice. Material sample orders and subconsultant costs paid upfront during a design phase, before that phase is billed and collected, represent real financing the firm is providing on the project's behalf. Tagging costs to their design phase at the point of purchase is the most direct way to see, project by project, how much of that financing gap the firm is actually carrying at any given time.
How do you coordinate subconsultant costs across a phase?
Structural, MEP, and other subconsultants typically bill by phase rather than by individual purchase, which makes Procurify's requisition model a natural fit: a purchase order can span an entire phase's engagement rather than requiring a new approval for every invoice. This also gives the firm a single place to check a subconsultant's overall phase budget against what's actually been billed so far, catching a subconsultant that's running ahead of the project's own schedule before it becomes a budget problem at the end of the phase.
Build a phase-close review into every project handoff
The moment one design phase closes and another begins is the natural point to review what the outgoing phase actually cost against what it billed, before attention shifts entirely to the next phase's demands. Pull every reimbursable cost, subconsultant invoice, and temporary software seat tagged to the closing phase, check it against the phase's invoice, and flag anything that was spent but never billed while there's still a reasonable chance to recover it. Firms that skip this and only look back at spend once a project fully closes often find several phases' worth of small, unbilled costs stacked up, each individually forgettable but collectively a meaningful dent in the project's overall margin. This review takes only a few minutes when tagging has been consistent through the phase, and considerably longer, sometimes too long to be worth doing thoroughly, when it hasn't.
At each phase close, work through these steps:
- Pull every reimbursable cost, subconsultant invoice and temporary software seat tagged to the phase that is closing, before attention moves to the next one.
- Compare that total against the phase invoice and flag any reimbursable cost that was never billed to the client.
- Check each subconsultant's running total against the purchase order covering the phase, not against individual invoices in isolation.
- Remove or reassign temporary BIM seats added for the closing phase if the next phase needs fewer people modeling.
- Record what the phase cost versus what it billed, so the next phase's budget starts from evidence.
Pick based on how many phases run in parallel
A firm running several projects at different phases simultaneously benefits from Procurify's ability to track phase-level budgets and temporary seat additions across all of them at once. A smaller firm running one or two projects at a time can often manage the same discipline manually with Ramp's card controls and good tagging habits. See Procurify vs Coupa vs Ramp for a look at a third platform.
What Good Looks Like
Every reimbursable cost is tagged to its project and design phase at the point of purchase, temporary software seats carry an end date tied to the phase that required them, and subconsultant spend is tracked against a phase budget rather than approved invoice by invoice.
Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)
How to Get Started
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
Use Ramp's card controls for the firm's steady baseline software and day-to-day purchases, reserving requisitions for phase-driven additions.
Use Process Street to standardize the checklist for adding and later removing temporary BIM seats tied to a specific project phase.
Use Zapier to flag a reimbursable cost that hasn't been tagged to a project within a few days of the charge posting.
Frequently Asked Questions
Should temporary BIM seats always have an end date?
Yes, tied to the project phase that required them. A seat added for a schematic design push should be reviewed, and likely removed, once the project moves into a phase that needs fewer people actively modeling.
How do we stop reimbursable costs from getting lost before billing?
Tag every reimbursable purchase, a rendering, a material sample, to its project and phase the moment it's made, not when the invoice is being prepared. A cost tagged at the point of purchase rarely gets forgotten; one reconstructed weeks later often does.
Should subconsultant purchase orders cover a whole phase or each invoice?
Covering a whole phase is usually more useful, since it gives the firm one place to track the subconsultant's total spend against the phase budget, rather than approving each invoice in isolation with no sense of the running total.
Is Ramp enough for a small architecture firm with steady project flow?
Often yes, if the firm has good tagging habits and isn't juggling many phases at once. Once several projects are running in different phases simultaneously, the budget-tracking discipline Procurify's requisitions provide starts to earn its keep.
Sources
Where we quote a benchmark, we show its source. Other figures in this guide are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.
- Receivables days (DSO proxy, AR/Sales x 365) by industry (US). NYU Stern (Aswath Damodaran), Working Capital Ratios by Industry, US, 2026.
- Payables days (AP/Sales x 365) by industry (US). NYU Stern (Aswath Damodaran), Working Capital Ratios by Industry, US, 2026.
Related Guides
Procurify vs Coupa vs Ramp: Procurement & Purchasing Software Compared
Compare Procurify, Coupa, and Ramp for purchase order approvals, 3-way matching, corporate cards, vendor contract tracking, and spend compliance controls.
Justworks vs Rippling for a Commercial Architecture Studio
Comparing Justworks and Rippling for a commercial architecture studio, from junior designer hiring through construction administration staffing.
The Verbal Change Order: A Walkthrough for Architecture Firms
A single project walkthrough showing where PandaDoc and Ironclad each help a commercial architecture firm get additional-services authorizations in writing.
Make vs Zapier for Architecture Studios: Revisions and Billing
See how Make and Zapier compare for an architecture or design studio tracking drawing revisions, client approval rounds and phase-based project billing.
Kandji vs Rippling IT for an Architecture Studio's Fleet
Architecture studios run heavy 3D modeling on powerful laptops and lean on contract renderers for deadlines. How Kandji and Rippling compare for that mix.
Rippling vs Firstbase for a Design Studio's Rendering Workstations
For commercial architecture and design studios: comparing Rippling and Firstbase for BIM workstations and project-based staffing.