Pylon vs Plain: A Runbook for a PT Network's Referral Queue
To run a physical therapy network's central queue in Pylon or Plain, give referral intake its own fast category, route insurance authorization questions to whoever owns verification, and keep facility issues separate from clinical ones. The queue mostly serves referring physician offices and affiliated clinics, and a slow referral can send the patient elsewhere.
Pylon and Plain can both support this, but only with a deliberate setup. Here's a runbook for building one.
Vendors Covered in this Article
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
How do you give referral intake its own fast path?
A referral from a physician's office is the closest thing this business has to a sales lead, and it behaves like one: the longer it sits unacknowledged, the more likely the patient ends up somewhere else or the referring office stops sending you cases at all. Whichever tool you configure, make referral intake its own category with the fastest response standard in your entire queue, and make sure a referral never gets lost in the same inbox as a routine internal question from your own staff.
The referring office rarely knows or cares how your intake process works internally. What they notice is whether their patient got contacted quickly, and a network that treats every referral with the same urgency as a routine internal request will eventually earn a reputation for being slow, even if most individual requests are actually handled reasonably well.
Who should answer insurance authorization questions?
An authorization question that lands with a front desk coordinator who doesn't handle insurance gets a guess or a promise to find out, neither of which actually helps a referring office or a patient waiting to start care. Build a routing rule that sends authorization questions directly to whoever owns insurance verification at your network, and make sure that person has visibility into which clinic and which payer the question involves, since authorization rules vary enough by payer that a generic answer often isn't a correct one.
Step three: separate a clinic's facility issue from a clinical one
A clinic director calling about a broken piece of equipment or an HVAC problem is a facilities and operations issue, not a clinical one, even though it can sound urgent and disruptive when it's affecting a full day of scheduled patients. Route facility issues to whoever manages vendor relationships and building maintenance directly, separate from clinical or referral questions, so a broken treatment table doesn't end up in the same queue as an authorization question competing for the same person's attention.
Step four: track clinician licensing across every state you operate in
A network operating across state lines has to track each clinician's license status, renewal date, and any state-specific continuing education requirements, and a lapsed license at even one location is a real compliance and liability problem, not just an administrative inconvenience. Build this as its own tracked category with reminders well ahead of renewal deadlines, rather than trusting that individual clinicians will flag their own upcoming expirations in time for your credentialing team to act.
This matters more the faster a network grows, since a clinician who picks up shifts at a second location across a state line can quietly fall out of compliance without anyone at either individual clinic noticing, because neither one has the full picture on its own. Central tracking is the only view that catches this kind of gap before it becomes a real problem.
Step five: build a referring-physician feedback loop that doesn't die
A referring physician's office that sends a patient and never hears anything back about how treatment went is less likely to send the next referral your way, and this relationship maintenance often falls through the cracks once the initial intake is handled. Whichever tool you use, build a light, recurring check-in into the referral category itself, a status update sent back to the referring office at a defined point in the plan of care, so the relationship gets tended even when nothing has gone wrong.
Step six: review the setup against a real bottleneck, not a hypothetical one
Once you've configured either tool, pull your slowest referral intake from the last month and walk it through the new setup end to end. If the new process wouldn't have caught the delay faster than what actually happened, that's a configuration gap worth fixing immediately, since a slow referral intake is the failure mode most likely to cost your network a whole relationship with a referring practice, not just one patient.
Walk your slowest recent referral through the new setup in this order:
- Pull the slowest referral intake from the last month and note when it arrived, who acknowledged it, and when the patient was contacted.
- Replay it through the new referral category and check whether the fastest response standard in your queue would have caught the delay sooner.
- Confirm the insurance authorization rule sent any related question straight to whoever owns verification, not to a front desk coordinator.
- Check that facility and clinical requests reached different owners, and that licensing reminders arrived well ahead of any renewal deadline.
- Fix any gap the replay exposes right away, since a slow referral intake is the failure most likely to cost you a referring relationship.
What Good Looks Like
Good support for a PT network means a referral gets fast intake before the patient loses momentum, an authorization question reaches someone who can actually answer it correctly for that payer, and clinician licensing across every state is tracked well ahead of renewal deadlines.
Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)
How to Get Started
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
Pylon fits a network where clinic directors and your central office already coordinate over a shared Slack or Teams channel, especially for the facilities and internal questions that don't need the speed a referral intake requires.
Process Street is a strong fit for your license renewal and referral intake checklists themselves, the actual steps a coordinator follows, so a new hire handles a referral the same way an experienced one would.
Frequently Asked Questions
Should referral intake and internal staff questions share a queue?
Keep them in the same platform but tag them completely separately, with referral intake carrying the faster response standard. A referring office's request should never wait behind an internal staff question about scheduling software, even inside the same tool.
How do we handle a clinician whose license is about to lapse in a state we didn't expect them to practice in?
Restrict their scheduling in that state immediately while the renewal is sorted out, and treat the gap as a process failure worth reviewing, since your tracking should have flagged the deadline weeks earlier. A same-day scramble means the tracking system, not the clinician, likely failed first.
What if a referring office prefers to call instead of using a portal or form?
Let them call, and log the referral into your queue immediately afterward with the same intake information you'd collect through any other channel. Don't ask a busy referring office to change how they prefer to reach you just to fit your system.
About the numbers
This guide doesn't quote a sourced benchmark. Figures in it are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.
Related Guides
Zendesk vs Intercom for an Outpatient PT Network
Outpatient PT networks juggle scheduling, insurance authorizations, and plan-of-care questions. Check these pitfalls before picking a helpdesk.
Justworks vs Rippling for a Multi-Clinic PT Network
A step-by-step guide for outpatient physical therapy networks weighing Justworks against Rippling for multi-state clinical staff payroll.
Make vs Zapier for Outpatient Physical Therapy Networks
Build a prior-authorization tracking worksheet for an outpatient physical therapy network to see exactly where Zapier, Make or Workato actually fits.
Rippling vs Firstbase for Outpatient PT Networks with Float Staff
Clinic-based therapists barely touch this problem, but float pool and home health staff do. Here's how an outpatient PT network should think about device tools.
Rippling vs Gusto for Outpatient PT Networks
A checklist for setting up productivity bonuses, PT Compact multi-state licensure, and PRN staff pay in Rippling or Gusto across a therapy network.
Kandji vs Rippling IT for an Outpatient PT Clinic Network
Physical therapy clinics share charting tablets across therapists all day. Here's how to pick a device platform that survives that workflow.